• bigbangdangler@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    “In this observational work, however, it appears that xylitol has a negative long-term effect on cardiovascular events in the general population. As with all observational studies, causalities are difficult to infer, but this work shows that further studies are mandated into this societally important topic.”

    This is important, because the outcome of the study is: we need more studies. It is not that xylitol has been shown to be dangerous, a jump so many comments have made.

    There was an observed effect in people who had “high blood levels of xylitol”. But there were few if any other controls:

    The researchers also highlighted that the association was independent of underlying factors such as body mass index, hypertension, diabetes and lipid levels, which might predispose people to low-calorie products.

    It’s been known for a while that extremely high levels of xylitol can act as a diuretic, but that’s true of a lot of other things, too. That’s also not relevant here. It’s important to not jump to unwarranted conclusions until more proper studies are conducted.

    • Delascas@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 minutes ago

      Just pointing out the obvious. A shill for xylitol (tobacco, diesel cars, coal power plants, Israel . . ) would say the exact same thing - “more study is needed . . .”

      • bigbangdangler@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        If you deny the scientific method because you fear everyone is a shill, you’re probably gonna have a bad time.

  • Doom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    44 minutes ago

    Xylitol? The sweetener that kills pets? I’m shocked, Shocked I say!

    • bigbangdangler@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      Chocolate also kills pets.

      If you read the article, you’ll see the authors of the study literally saying that not many conclusions should be drawn from it.

  • nul42@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    What sort of diet leads to high blood levels? My guess is the xylitol in my mouthwash or toothpaste that I spit out isn’t causing a high level in the blood and still benefits my oral health. Any studies on that?

  • brackled@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It is important to note that this was an observational study, meaning it can only show an association between higher xylitol levels and cardiovascular events, rather than proving that xylitol directly caused them, and further research is needed. But it is not a green light to have more sugar instead, as we still need to reduce our free sugar intake

    Correlation vs Causation caveat is strongly needed here

  • realitista@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Dammit. I chew a lot of gum and there is no good option. I have to start looking for sugared gum.

    • folekaule@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Avoid sugared gum. I also used to chew a lot of gum and was trying to stick with sorbitol because xylitol gave me stomach pains. That limited me to Wrigley’s. Anyway, due to my confusion after it went out of stock, I was buying sugared gum instead, and finally ended up having to fill 6 cavities before I checked the label and made the connection. All that sugar sitting on my teeth all day was not good, to say the least. I quit cold turkey after that (and also gum).

    • Pringles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Search for chewing gum that uses sorbitol as sweetener instead. Luckily for me my favorite brand, Airwaves, uses that and not xylitol.

      • realitista@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Isn’t it just another sugar alcohol? I’m sure it’s up next on the list, just not as popular.

        • Pringles@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It is a sugar alcohol, but also naturally occurring in apples and pears, so it at least seems safer.

          • realitista@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Xylitol also occurs naturally in plums, strawberries, raspberries, rowanberries, and bananas among others. And our livers even produce small amounts when breaking down sugars.

      • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 hours ago

        If you had one single job to do before posting a comment, what do you think that job would be? 🤡🤦

        • Albbi@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago
          1. Read headline
          2. Read comments to see if link is worth opening.
          3. Respond to interesting comments
          4. Maaaybe open the link.

          This is what everyone does, right?

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        xylitol is not good for your dog. Eating your left over chewed gum could be enough to kill a dog. It’s a potent poison. And a nasty death I hear.

    • bramkaandorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      More like ban it outright. Anything that is generally seen as safe, but with some caveats, gets RFK jr. to foam at the mouth about how dangerous it is.

  • bw42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I complain to my wife all the time that sugar alcohols shoild be banned from food products.

    • PlantJam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I swear I’ve seen companies advertise “no artificial sweeteners” while using things like stevia or monk fruit. Maybe I’m misremembering, but it’s so irritating that you just have to know an increasingly long list of sweeteners to check for.

      • Biffsbraincell@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Well yeah because stevia and monk fruit aren’t artificial, they’re natural alternatives to sweeteners.

        I’m not making health claims but they do grow in the ground hence non artificial.

        But yeah I don’t really like them, so I would wish it would say low sugar, and also no added sweetener alternatives or something, since that’s what I like and I will see low sugar and then buy it and it’s sickly sweet with the fake ones…

        • PlantJam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          38 minutes ago

          “No added sugar” but then the ingredients list extra juice concentrate is another pet peeve.

  • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Heard this about Erithrytol as well. Not sure if that one is as confirmed. Cove Soda uses it, and I’m reluctant even though it’s tasty and Canadian.

      • Sturgist@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If I’m blocked up I drink two sips of a diet coke…while sitting on the can. Aspartame clears everything out…right…fucking…now.