• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Remember when Elon was all about “transitioning the world to sustainable transportation”? LOL

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      He was never about that.

      He said he was, but actions speak louder and if he ever was he’d be promoting Hydrogen-electric with a Hydrogen ICE transition* instead of battery electric which isn’t sustainable and is environmentally disastrous in its own way.

      *Diesel ICE can be converted to Hydrogen ICE (note: they still need ~5-10% diesel, so it’s not a forever technology) - https://www.unsw.edu.au/engineering/research-technology/is/converting-diesel-engines-to-run-on-hydrogen

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Batteries have a much smaller overall environmental footprint than traditional ICE vehicles. Hydrogen is also produced at scale in a super dirty way right now. There is no clean way to produce hydrogen fuel. So, our goal should be less travel overall, public transit, and EVs, in that order.

        If we find a way to mass produce hydrogen in a clean way, then I’m all for hydrogen vehicles. But, we aren’t there yet.

      • Logi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Give it up. Hydrogen is not happening. Batteries have won. Now we need to move to more sustainable chemistries.

        Oh, and yeah, Elon was always just posing.

        • kevinandmensi@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          While I believe that the various pushes for hydrogen in cars and light trucks is a shameless attempt at replacing the revenue stream from petrol, hydrogen does make a lot of sense for heavy trucks, trains, ships - anywhere diesel or bunker fuel is used now.

          • Logi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Or possibly converted into ammonia which is not as hard to transport. But yeah, there might be some residual uses.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        My diesel car has run on B100 (100% biodiesel) just fine for years. That’s already good enough and requires no new technology or infrastructure. Hydrogen is stupid as hell.

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Hydrogen can make some degree of sense if we take as an energy reserve, stockpileable, for an event where it is necessary to suplement energy needs.

          So many countries with solar farms being turned off to prevent grid collapse could consider building hydrogen plants or, those with sea acess, dessalination stations, to stockpile fresh water underground and extract minerals directly from the water.