It’s unacceptable for a tool to sacrifice an iota of clarity, coherence, meaning, quality, etc. for the purpose of embedding hidden clues within the text to suggest its provenance. The idea that anything other than *my* needs should factor into the generation of text *for me* is patently offensive.
What a strange article. They realize that LLMs choose words based on chance, right?
The fact they use the word providence means this is entirely llm generated bullshit
The only thing to unironically use that word are llms, and really badly written fantasy novels.