Kind of unrelated, but a coworker shared a spreadsheet with me the other day, and instead of dragging down to autocomplete the row number or using ctrl+d, he wrote a “1” then “A1+1” and dragged that down. It kept breaking because the rows had to be rearranged, and if you initially highlighted a modified row before dragging it would propagate the error down.
It’s a valid method that avoids some edge cases where Excel’s autocomplete gets confused. He just forgot the last step of copy and then paste back into the same cells as text to remove the formula.
My pet peeve is my coworker who finds it easier to write macros to analyze the data instead of setting up formulas, and then I am completely unable to follow his analysis logic because it’s all just columns of numbers with no way to tell what was used to calculate what.
“So you do vlookup like this and then drag it down to autofill.”
“𒀝𒋗 𒈠 𒀭𒉈 𒁀𒀭𒌅𒈬”
xlookup rather than vlookup - we’re not living in the Ubaid period.
Ah, the Index/Match technique, I haven’t used this one since Heian era
Kind of unrelated, but a coworker shared a spreadsheet with me the other day, and instead of dragging down to autocomplete the row number or using ctrl+d, he wrote a “1” then “A1+1” and dragged that down. It kept breaking because the rows had to be rearranged, and if you initially highlighted a modified row before dragging it would propagate the error down.
You’re an engineer, damnit.
It’s a valid method that avoids some edge cases where Excel’s autocomplete gets confused. He just forgot the last step of copy and then paste back into the same cells as text to remove the formula.
My pet peeve is my coworker who finds it easier to write macros to analyze the data instead of setting up formulas, and then I am completely unable to follow his analysis logic because it’s all just columns of numbers with no way to tell what was used to calculate what.