• lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Yeah, no jack no thanks …

    Not a deal breaker for others but it is for me. Their rationale saying that the USB-C is more resilient than the jack is weird because I’ve never had the jack fail and even if it does isn’t that why you’re selling a repairable phone to me …?

    Anyways, I see they’re selling earbuds so I’m going to assume that that’s their main motivator.

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’ve had several 3.5mm jacks fail. I’ve yet to have a USBC port fail, but I’ve also had fewer USBC ports and for fewer years.

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Oh oh oh I can do this one.

        6 USB-C port failures in my 1.75 years with the phone.

        Fuck HMD Global (then Nokia brand) and their absolute trash USB ports.

        • forkDestroyer@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          6 USB-C port failures in my 1.75 years with the phone.

          That’s wild.

          I had a micro USB charging port give me an issue once, but I’ve never had a program with a headphone jack or USBC port. Wow.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’ve had them both be problematic. Nothing deoxit can’t fix.

        Headphone jacks have a hell of a lot of leverage on that port. An IP68 headphone jack is honestly pretty bulky.

        I’d rather have one. I also also like us to go back to phones that are 1cm+ thick and just fill it out with battery.