• starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Two things are true: one, the “I appreciate the pushback” line was regarding his guest, not a leftover AI thing. Two, this is still strikes 2 and 3 for me. Been wary of him ever since the knitting debacle, and AI use is a bridge too far

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Been a minute since I watched it, but essentially Scishow did an episode about the science of knitting (and other forms of fabric crafting, which they did not adequately distinguish between) without consulting a single person who knits. It came off as really dismissive of the craft, like it’s somehow super surprising that knitting is actually interesting.

        I’ll update this comment with a better explanation after work, check back in 12 hours

        • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          I got this vibe from stuff you should know podcast once early on, but after i was mad at them for a while, I still listen, and they seem to do a better job now.

          When you’re making edutainment for a general audience, there’s going to be some things that will seem obvious to experts, so i can’t really knock them for that.

          But I can knock them for not doing their research and putting out wrong information, especially if they don’t retract it later.

          Edit: this video is a knitter explaining it well. She doesn’t blame Hank either, but explains the reaction and the context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHpGoYlzmog