idk it’s my first time (kind of) trying to do dataviz, I thought the original post was super interesting but like other comments said, it was hard to read.

I think in a way it’s mostly because defederation is complex to show as links, since it is the break of said link, but hopefully this type of graph is better ?

you do lose the “group” of instances view, though (and also I did not bother with per instance MAU as raw number + percentage, or sofware used)

let me know what you think!

  • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ah, thankyou! As a lazy person not sure who my instance was blocking, I now know. Excellent. Better find an instance who doesn’t block any instances.

  • Rimu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Cool diagram.

    If you removed hexbear and lemmygrad (nearly everyone defederates them so they just clutter the place up) then the other information would be clearer. For example I didn’t notice that beehaw has defederated both lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works until my third viewing.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It doesn’t even Include https://lemmy.today/ that has no defederation or blocking at all, and has never had, since the admin feels it’s up to the user and not the admin to decide these things. You know, free and open internet, remember?

    Also one of the best themes of all Lemmy instances if you ask me.

    • Pika@hikki.team
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Came here to say that!

      I can’t comprehend why people would join instances in the list. If you don’t like a particular instance, just hop into the user settings and block it! Why let others set your blocklist?

    • inlandempire@jlai.luOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You gotta ask the OOP about that, but my guess is, in a graph that shows instances that defederate, why include an instance that doesn’t?

    • Hildegard (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Legal risk. Being federated means mirroring the content locally and that can cause liability for the instance owner. Laws around porn can vary by country and to some being federated could be illegal, or be an unreasonable risk.

  • Snoopy@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The similar color makes it slightly difficult to read but the graph is better, and easier to understand. Anyways, you are skilled, good job :3

  • ozoned@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I know lots of folks look at this and see a shattering of the what they expect. The Fediverse is NOT a platform. Lemmy.world is NOT the Threadiverse. Let’s break these bonds. I left a server because I was suspected of being a CIA plant. I went to one that was more welcoming. I found they were too strict for me on their rules. I left that. I’m not on piefed.social. I’m planning on running my own piefed for ME and MY family/friends hopefully SOON^TM. If someone defederates from me, that’s ok, they didn’t want me to be a part of their community. MY community still exists.

    These aren’t platforms that are out there trying to save the entire world. They’re building a community that interconnects to other communities. Don’t like how they’re doing it, you can literally spin up your own for dollars per month.

    Yes, if you want your stuff to be found you have to advocate for it.

    I think the Trek communities are stand outs of how this works and how it should be done. Think of like old Forum days. Normally folks would create a forum for a specific topic and other thigns would go other places. But now those forums connect and you can run your own and connect to everyone.

    Break this idea that this major pillars disconnecting are fracturing the fediverse. IMO the more small instances we have the stronger the network.

    So build a Piefed/Lemmy/Mastodon/GoToSocial/Bonfire whatever for your community and then allow those to connect out to others.

    The idea of this change is scary though. And maybe I’m wrong. Maybe we can’t exist the way I hope we do. But I think humans strive for community and communication and we have a new way to provide it to them.

    • Rimu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are 500 Lemmy instances and 80 PieFed instances which are too small to show on the graph :)

    • Auster@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Besides, and related to “not being a platform”, it helps break the idea of everyone having to share the same space with everyone. If two groups can’t have a healthy relationship, it is healthier for them to cut ties with each other. Meanwhile, the oligarchic platforms being as big and with barely any internal borders makes for the toxic environment of places like Reddit and Twitter that predates recent polemics.

  • Auster@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    A bit scarier than the previous one at first glance, but the single line explanation including everything needed to understand makes it easier to read.

    • Auster@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Something though, I think it’d be better to have a cut-off of MAU or some other relevance metric, as otherwise smaller instances defederating from major ones may sneakily make the major one seem more isolated than it really is.

  • Holla@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This graph is indeed a lot more intuitively readable. I think it could be improved further by avoiding needlessly crossing the arrows, like for example pawb.social -> lemmygrad.ml is crossing multiple other arrows, even though they are right next to another. Some arrows could also be shorter to avoid crossings, like beehaw.org -> sh.itjust.works

  • yoru77@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    When I saw it I thought of this quote: “Why Is It When Something Happens, It’s Always You three?” Tbh I didn’t know about 2 of 3 Top 3 defederated instances, I know why feddit is defederated, but why is lemmygrad?

        • Cleisthenian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Modern liberal democracy is authoritarian too, it’s just that a different group of people hold the keys. Would you support defederating with every instance that is aligned with liberal democracy?

          • yoru77@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Modern liberal democracy is authoritarian too, it’s just that a different group of people hold the keys

            I can see that some Western countries lean towards authoritarian, but for example Switzerland? How is this country authoritarian?

            Would you support defederating with every instance that is aligned with liberal democracy?

            Tbh, I can understand the reasons why some instances want to defederate from others. if I look in scenario that I’m the administrator of my own instance I don’t know if I would defederate from any instance, like I don’t think I’m knowledgeable enough about every instance and about their own quirks

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I find it mildly interesting that there’s no inverse of lemmygrad, that defederates from everybody else

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Defederation is often seen as a last resort and generally seen pretty negatively. Defederating everyone would also get rid of most content