

Since AI cannot be trusted for accuracy, using it as an unreliable search tool makes sense to me. Even when it is wrong, your goal is to validate.


Since AI cannot be trusted for accuracy, using it as an unreliable search tool makes sense to me. Even when it is wrong, your goal is to validate.


This is not a “watermark,” it is a minor shift of statistical probability. Whether content contains that “shift” will be “measured” using more AI-based tools that will flag sentence structures that hew toward faintly less common word selections.
We need AI companies to shut the fuck down. We do not need theatrics designed to deceive the populace into thinking this is not akshually a great filter moment while false positives and ponzy-scheme AI buildout harm those of us who want nothing to do with these tech-bro beatified lorem ipsum regurgitators.
Don’t fall for the theatrics. This is not at all what they are trying to bill it.


They’re invisible, they survive copying, and they work because they don’t live in the characters at all. They live in the choices between words.
So it is yet another way for AI to falsely hurt neurodivergent people over their writing styles and word choices.
Fuck AI.
Did they end up on a US terrorism list for offering free things like filthy communists?