

I’m not sure we’ve read the same article. There are literally interactive demonstrations within the page to demonstrate how the concept works.


I’m not sure we’ve read the same article. There are literally interactive demonstrations within the page to demonstrate how the concept works.


I fucking hate everyone and would love to subject you fucks to 4g of pain taking off with a stupid catapult system. Nice math.


I think the bad taste in my mouth is the 300k copies they sold and the need to then do this? Stepping over pounds to save pennies etc.


I thought the article explained that pretty reasonably on a scale of probability and weight. The longer the text, the more reliable the scoring.


Sell access to Turnitin and the likes for a small fortune. They are all but required to pay whatever the price is.


The publisher sold keys to GreenManGaming (and probably other stores ) and then the developers unilaterally revoked all serials without first checking if they were legitimate?
Sounds like the developers are running their company out of a shed and are immature.


He 100% has no fucking clue what he is saying or doing from day to day and is being fed bullshit by people behind him. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain bullshit.


My guess would be almost all routinely updated Filterlists will continue to block Facebook ads, and probably even more relentlessly now.
Gish Gallop… if you’re going to start questioning whether the technique clearly demonstrated has validity, then you need to specifically state what your objections are, as opposed to vague statements. For emphasis, the demonstration isn’t on AI detecting, but rather AI watermarking. You wouldn’t use this tool to check if text was written by AI, but rather if the text was written by one singular LLM vs literally everything else.