When people do code review off a pull request and sees it’s slop, it will go back to the developer to fix it. I guess if a person submit too much slop, they will get banned or something similar.

However, I don’t know the Debian process to have new code submitted, but would guess that it have to be more than one person to go from code to build a package.

Can’t we just build it into systemd?

Have no idea, but we’re probably talking 10+ years ago, probably on Reddit when people kindly corrected people’s writing mistakes 😂

Totally off topic, and not trying to be a dick, but this helped me remember a lot vs alot

I would say it’s okay with more than yes/no. You could say yes, but only if code review by human. The difference is that if you can only say yes or no, you would have to say yes, but then don’t know if the details of the final rules of AI in the project would actually be a dealbreaker for you. However, these options are a little too much.

Again, you can’t compare a transmission to an operating system. And not everyone using Linux takes a deep dive into everything in there. But if your Ford kept having transmission issues you might go with a Toyota the next time - that’s what I meant about caring/paying attention

You would care about (or at least pay attention to) the transmission if your car kept breaking down because of it. But unlike a car, on a computer you could relatively easy change out the OS with something else.

As always, the analogy between cars and computers are not one to one.