• chrash0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    the AI explanation and reasoning is weak. what does “largely disappears” mean without numbers? Cloudflare doesn’t do vibes; give me numbers. in any case “desktop” surely means that the user-agent reflects a desktop browser and not a CLI tool, right? otherwise this number would be closer to 90% than 10%. unless the agents are intentionally spoofing browser user-agents i don’t buy it.

    no mention of Steam’s and Framework’s hardware offering that come with Linux? no mention of the clear mass migrations?

    here’s an AI explanation: LLMs are helping people who otherwise would struggle move to Linux

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Crawlers—even the honest ones—have been spoofing browser User-Agent strings (partially or completely) since the beginning of the commercial Internet. Why would they do this? To dodge bad browser-sniffing scripts, which I still run into from time to time.

      • chrash0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        sure, but is that implying that 5% of this traffic is bad faith or rogue agents? the tools built into Claude Code and Codex surely have their own user-agent settings.

        and why would they spoof Linux instead of Windows?

        • nyan@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          sure, but is that implying that 5% of this traffic is bad faith or rogue agents?

          Given the volume of requests that have been semi-DDOS’ing a lot of servers? 5% is probably an underestimate.

          the tools built into Claude Code and Codex surely have their own user-agent settings.

          “Surely” is like “assume”—it says more about the speaker than the entity being discussed. They almost certainly don’t use completely distinct strings (no one does—they all start with “Mozilla/5.0”); at most they might have tacked an additional bit on at the tail. And that’s if they’re being aboveboard.

          and why would they spoof Linux instead of Windows?

          Why not? But actually, this may be due to an incorrect assumption on the part of the stats collectors. Typical strings for bots that admit to being bots don’t specify an OS: “Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko); compatible; ChatGPT-User/1.0; +https://openai.com/bot” as opposed to, say “Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/134.0.0.0” or “Mozilla/5.0 (Android 15; Mobile; SM-G556B/DS; rv:130.0) Gecko/130.0 Firefox/130.0”. If they’re dumping anything without OS markers into the “Linux” bucket, that might do it.