• BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Oh no, won’t somebody think of his privacy

    Btw in a completely unrelated train of thought, have you guys seen the low low prices on poo flinging trebuchets?

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Does he feel unsafe? Just put up a Flock camera on your house, Garrett! So we can all be sure that you are as safe as a bug all snug in a rug.

  • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Its almost like privacy is a good thing.

    Hope nothing bad happens to you. Surely not. Flock cameras make everything safer right?

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This is a periodic reminder. I’m on mobile so I’m copying a previous comment.

    Flock Safety is only the tip of the problem.

    Some districts are de-Flocking only to install an Axon ALPR network service. Keep fighting until your community outlaws all ALPRs and ALPR lookups are inadmissable in court.

    There are other technologies that are already in use and widely abused by law enforcement such as IMSI catchers, geofence warrants and Drones as First Responder. Learn what your district allows and be a civil nuisance untill that shit is blocked.

    Judges have long ceased tightly constraining judicial warrants, and most courts accept the good faith exception, so US and state courts cannot be trusted with any overreaching surveillance technology or forensic tools. This includes chromatic field drug tests and detection dogs.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    19 hours ago

    He’s cool with stealing all of our data, and making us feel helpless about what others are doing with it, so I don’t see why he shouldn’t feel that same fear.

  • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    What’s the problem? I thought privacy was a small price to pay for “safety?”

    Sounds like that Kirk guy on guns.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    What shit headline. Property ownership was always public record. His address was shared forever by the county assessor. Like everyone’s.

    • gtg859r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Famous people and CEOs typically buy their houses through shell companies and rent to themselves for this exact reason.