Yes but also no.
I mean, in my opinion, making a stochastic agentic program is irresponsible, selling it as AI is unethical, and using it is also irresponsible, but there’s a question of how much an average Joe Shmoe should be liable for given how the tools are marketed. It’s complicated, but it’s not an unsolvable problem.
It’s also a matter of audience. Part of what lets Nebula work at all is the built-in audience for the creators that are there. Same with droput.tv and c5.now and even means.tv.
Peertube will work better as more and bigger creators cross-post to it. Another challenge it faces though is scaling and yes, monetization since there’s no subscription system through the platform by default.
Aquara C1. Use Home Assistant and your own Zigbee antenna.
It’s actually pretty handy, and can be useful for portion control too.
There is no reason it should require a cloud connection.
Repeat after me: Local control. Local control. Local control.
“The Cloud” is just other people’s computers.
Sure but how do you get on Nebula?
As far as I know it comes from having an established YouTube presence first.
It’s not impossible to determine who is at fault, it just hasn’t been determined yet. It would be far better to determine in advance, but a lot of this is going to end up in front of judges and be decided by case law unfortunately.
Oooh, I want to see how this unfolds.
You had me up until “you can’t really fault anyone involved”, because actually you can.
These systems are designed, marketed, and used irresponsibly. In the case of any given error we will have to decide which party violated our expectations and committed the act most responsible for the crime.
The person who inputs it is responsible for the outputs.
It’ll happen to all makes unless trends change.
This utter disregard from preservation goes hand in hand with the all too common notion that these are “just” games, and not art.
That’s a a public education problem.