This is the same kind of manosphere twitterbro circlejerk logic that brought us this
They must be thinking about Hollywood’s depiction of exaggerated “manly” Spartan homosexuality. They just want to LARP 300 so bad, you guys.
Did they actually show any homosexuality in the movie 300?
No, ironically the Spartans in the movie made fun of the Athenians by calling them boy lovers. Which is hilarious considering that Spartan society was way more homosexual than Athenian society.
I always interpreted it as a Spartan preference for grown men over boys.
Like more Freddie Mercury and less Judy Garland, please.
What does he means with “ancient homosexuality” vs “feminized homosexuality” ? And then why he even cares about it?
They made homosex woke. Enough said
Ruined the gay sex for the rest of us. Smdh
Hey now, the ancients were ped erasts, not ped ophiles. The fancy term makes it okay!
(Just don’t point out that the difference is that pederasty means same-sex pedophilia. Or do! I wonder how they’d react.)
How is there another nuanced difference in terminology for sexual attraction to children (that I didn’t know yet)
Why the fuck do people give that many fucks over how other people fuck? What does it matter?
Amen to this! Let people be, let people fuck what ever they want.
*In some sensible guardrails, let’s exclude kids and maybe dead people, animals and such, you know. But as long as there’s consent, I don’t give a fuck.
Harkness rule ftw.
Don’t the Greeks and Roman’s have a lot of stereotypical butt jokes made about them?
Why does Romans get an apostrophe but not Greeks and jokes?
Also:
###s: plural form###'s: expresses owner
